|
Cortez B/W
(AD 900-1000)
The following are some representative
examples of Cortez B/W sherds:


(Click on image to enlarge.)
Type
Ceramics Provenience Info
Type sites:
|
Mesa Verde N. P.: Site 16, Site 1425, Badger House
(Breternitz et
al:34). |
Dating:
|
Pueblo I. Late AD 800s through 900s.
AD 900-1000. Probably 50-75 yrs more (Abel
1955, in Hayes and
Lancaster:127).
Early P II – the major pottery (Hayes and
Lancaster:118).
Early P II – AD 900-1000 (Lucius and
Breternitz:21; Breternitz et
al:34).
P I, late 800s in conjunction with Piedra (Wilson and
Blinman:49).
Dominant early 900s—late 1000s, replacement by Mancos by 1050 (Wilson and
Blinman:49-50).
AD 880-1050 (Varien:Appendix
A(1)).
|
Texture:
|
Medium (Breternitz et
al:33). |
Temper:
|
Crushed igneous, 85%. Some rock and sand or rock and sherd (Hayes and Lancaster:118).
Crushed igneous in half of sample; crushed rock and sherd in one-third of sample; the rest
mainly sherd, some rock (Cattenach:209).
Crushed sherd or crushed igneous rock (Varien:Appendix
A(1)).
|
Slip:
|
Well slipped (Varien:Appendix
A(1)).
89% of jars, 94% of bowls. Even application, medium thickness, fine crackling
(Hayes
and Lancaster:118).
¾ of bowl and jar interiors; ¼ of bowl exteriors; crackled slip on ¼ (Cattenach:210).
At Puzzle House: often bright-white, well-shined slip, but without crackling. A few, distinctly
Cortez in design and shape, lack white slip and have a gray surface.
|
Paint:
|
Mineral (Varien:Appendix
A(1)).
Almost entirely mineral; 0.3% organic (Hayes and
Lancaster:120).
Mineral on all (73) sherds in sample (Cattenach:209).
Mineral in organic medium; rarely organic alone (Breternitz et
al:33).
Paint on bowl and ladle interiors, handles, upper exteriors of jars, pitchers, ollas (Breternitz et
al:33).
|
Polish:
|
Generally well polished (Breternitz et
al:33; Varien:Appendix
A(1)).
At Badger House, of 100 sherds, all had some; 88% both inside and out (Hayes and
Lancaster:118).
At Long House, all of 73-sherd sample had low luster polish (Cattenach:118).
|
Rims:
|
Painted solid. Tapered, rounded
(Breternitz et
al:33).
Rims: Solid. Under 1% have perpendicular ticks continuing onto inside (Hayes and
Lancaster:122).
|
Shape:
|
Corrugated bowl exteriors in
~ 2.5% (Breternitz et
al:34).
Half-gourd dipper – 57% (Hayes and
Lancaster:118).
Pitchers: Distinguishable shoulder. Shorter, straight neck.
Handles: Flat handle increases with time; solid round handle
persists (Hayes and
Lancaster:118).
Seed jars common but flattened (spherical earlier) (Hayes and
Lancaster:118).
Unique bowl shape: wide ‘step’ or flare around upper 1/3
(Morris term: double-flare)
(Hayes and
Lancaster:119).
|
Design:
|
Cortez decoration: "the division, subdivision, and resubdivision of the surface. .
.[with] numerous
repeated individual elements of design"
(Hayes and
Lancaster:121-122).
Characteristic layout: "repetition
of several unrelated design elements in almost every
conceivable
combination" (Hayes
and Lancaster:114).
Single, dropped framing line in about 1/3 of the bowls; (occurs, but
much less common in Mancos)
(Hayes and
Lancaster:122).
In Badger House examples: Bands or units of thin parallel lines
constitute a design motif, or a division
between other motifs. Line and filler segments often run
diagonal to the rim. Bowl designs are very
space-filling. Solid triangles are
common;
often one side is ticked, scalloped, or stepped.
Distinctive designs include solid-triangle
starbursts; concentric, thin, banding of diamond medallion.
‘Kiatuthlana’ decoration: Bands of fine parallel lines turn
in nested right angles as they encircle the
vessel. In Mancos pottery, similar bands do not turn
as a unit; they end at another band or design
(Hayes and
Lancaster:123).
Scrolls: Interlock and often emerge from the tips of ticked triangles
(distinctive of PII), or appear in a
broad band below the rim. Later Mesa Verde scrolls, even
when interlocking, tend to be angular.
Mancos scrolls are themselves boldly flagged (Hayes and Lancaster: 124,
126).
Hachure: Between parallel lines is much less common in Cortez (6%) than Mancos (51%).
At Badger House, Cortez hachure is more widely-spaced
than Mancos, squiggled rather than
straight (85%), usually has guidelines,
has zig-zags rather than curves, is at right angles to framing
lines (Hayes and Lancaster:
124). The squiggled line was almost absent in Mancos pottery
(Hayes and
Lancaster:122), although this may be a function of the type definitions used.
Line embellishment: Cross-ticking with neat, evenly- and closely-spaced short
lines. Or oblique,
feather-style ticking. A line embellished
with dots along one side is more typical of Mancos
(Hayes and
Lancaster:124), although it is seen on a Cortez vessel from Big Juniper house
(Swannack 1969:74,
76).
Straight lines: Often edged with solid-triangle flagging or oblique ticking.
Linear patterns: Differ from Piedra in having narrow lines, wider spacing (Varien:Appendix
A(1).
At Puzzle House: line-work is clean but not always ultra-fine; sometimes broad-brush.
|
[ Cortez
B/w Notes I Return
to Ceramic Types Home ]
|